Read Anywhere and on Any Device!

Subscribe to Read | $0.00

Join today and start reading your favorite books for Free!

Create Free Account

Quick and Easy Sign Up!

It takes less then 1 minute to sign up, then you can enjoy Unlimited eBooks.

Sign Up Browse

Popular Genres

Read Anywhere and on Any Device!

  • Download on iOS
  • Download on Android
  • Download on iOS

The Real Case for Auschwitz: Robert van Pelt’s Evidence from the Irving Trial Critically Reviewed (Holocaust Handbooks Book 22)

The Real Case for Auschwitz: Robert van Pelt’s Evidence from the Irving Trial Critically Reviewed (Holocaust Handbooks Book 22)

Carlo Mattogno
3.5/5 ( ratings)
Read Download
In 1993 Jewish theologian Deborah Lipstadt called British historian David Irving a “Holocaust denier.” Irving sued her for libel in return. Subsequently a court case unfolded in England which attracted the attention of the world’s mass media in 2000. The sharpest weapon in Lipstadt’s defense arsenal was Jewish art historian Robert van Pelt, who presented an expert report claiming to refute revisionist assertions about Auschwitz. Because Irving had neither the support by any expert witnesses nor was he himself an expert on the Holocaust, he inevitable lost the case. Robert van Pelt was therefore praised as the defeater of revisionism. When he published his revised expert report in his book "The Case for Auschwitz" in 2002, he even advanced to the foremost expert on Auschwitz in the public’s eyes. Mattogno’s "Auschwitz: the Case for Sanity" is the revisionist response to Robert van Pelt. Its first revelation is that van Pelt has committed plagiarism: he plundered and basically regurgitated the research results published in 1989 and 1993 by French researcher Jean-Claude Pressac -- yet without naming his source even once. On more than 700 pages, Mattogno thoroughly scrutinizes van Pelt’s contorted assertions by juxtaposing them to material and documentary facts. Mattogno’s analysis is devastating for van Pelt, as it reveals that van Pelt’s study of Auschwitz ignores crucial counter-arguments, fails to approach pivotal technical issues with technical means, is highly inconsistent, uses deceptive methods, presents conflicting sources without due source criticism, deforms all sources to serve the author’s perspective, and reveals a shockingly threadbare knowledge of the history of Auschwitz. Mattogno therefore concludes: “The Case for Auschwitz is neither a scholarly nor a historical work; it is only a biased journalistic assemblage of poorly understood and poorly interpreted historical sources.” This is a book of prime political and scholarly importance, as it delivers the exterminationists’ case the most devastating blow ever!
Language
English
Pages
877
Format
Kindle Edition
Publisher
The Barnes Review
Release
January 12, 2015

The Real Case for Auschwitz: Robert van Pelt’s Evidence from the Irving Trial Critically Reviewed (Holocaust Handbooks Book 22)

Carlo Mattogno
3.5/5 ( ratings)
Read Download
In 1993 Jewish theologian Deborah Lipstadt called British historian David Irving a “Holocaust denier.” Irving sued her for libel in return. Subsequently a court case unfolded in England which attracted the attention of the world’s mass media in 2000. The sharpest weapon in Lipstadt’s defense arsenal was Jewish art historian Robert van Pelt, who presented an expert report claiming to refute revisionist assertions about Auschwitz. Because Irving had neither the support by any expert witnesses nor was he himself an expert on the Holocaust, he inevitable lost the case. Robert van Pelt was therefore praised as the defeater of revisionism. When he published his revised expert report in his book "The Case for Auschwitz" in 2002, he even advanced to the foremost expert on Auschwitz in the public’s eyes. Mattogno’s "Auschwitz: the Case for Sanity" is the revisionist response to Robert van Pelt. Its first revelation is that van Pelt has committed plagiarism: he plundered and basically regurgitated the research results published in 1989 and 1993 by French researcher Jean-Claude Pressac -- yet without naming his source even once. On more than 700 pages, Mattogno thoroughly scrutinizes van Pelt’s contorted assertions by juxtaposing them to material and documentary facts. Mattogno’s analysis is devastating for van Pelt, as it reveals that van Pelt’s study of Auschwitz ignores crucial counter-arguments, fails to approach pivotal technical issues with technical means, is highly inconsistent, uses deceptive methods, presents conflicting sources without due source criticism, deforms all sources to serve the author’s perspective, and reveals a shockingly threadbare knowledge of the history of Auschwitz. Mattogno therefore concludes: “The Case for Auschwitz is neither a scholarly nor a historical work; it is only a biased journalistic assemblage of poorly understood and poorly interpreted historical sources.” This is a book of prime political and scholarly importance, as it delivers the exterminationists’ case the most devastating blow ever!
Language
English
Pages
877
Format
Kindle Edition
Publisher
The Barnes Review
Release
January 12, 2015

More books from Carlo Mattogno

The Myth of the Extermination of the Jews

3.9/5 ( ratings)

Auschwitz Lies: Legends, Lies, And Prejudices On The Holocaust

2.8/5 ( ratings)

Sobibor: Holocaust Propaganda and Reality

3.8/5 ( ratings)

Auschwitz: The Case for Sanity - A Historical and Technical Study of Jean-Claude Pressac's "Criminal Traces" and Robert Jan Van Pelt's "Convergence of Evidence"

4/5 ( ratings)

Healthcare in Auschwitz: Medical Care and Special Treatment of Registered Inmates (Holocaust Handbooks Book 33)

4/5 ( ratings)

Treblinka: Transit Camp or Extermination Camp?

3/5 ( ratings)

Fail: "Debunking Holocaust Denial Theories": How James and Lance Morcan botched their Attempt to Affirm the Historicity of the Nazi Genocide

2/5 ( ratings)

Inside the Gas Chambers: The Extermination of Mainstream Holocaust Historiography

2/5 ( ratings)

Concentration Camp Majdanek: A Historical and Technical Study

5/5 ( ratings)

Chelmno: A German Camp in History and Propaganda

5/5 ( ratings)

The "Extermination Camps" of "Aktion Reinhardt": An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious “Evidence,” Deceptions and Flawed Argumentation of the “Holocaust ... Bloggers (Holocaust Handbooks Book 28)

5/5 ( ratings)

Gesundheitsfursorge in Auschwitz: Die Medizinische Versorgung Und Sonderbehandlung Registrierter Haftlinge

5/5 ( ratings)

Commandant of Auschwitz: Rudolf H�ss, His Torture and His Forced Confessions

5/5 ( ratings)

Deliveries of Coke, Wood and Zyklon B to Auschwitz: Neither Proof Nor Trace for the Holocaust

5/5 ( ratings)

Auschwitz Lies: Legends, Lies, and Prejudices on the Holocaust (Holocaust Handbooks Book 18)

5/5 ( ratings)

Fail: "Denying History" How Michael Shermer and Alex Grobman Botched Their Attempt to Refute Those Who Say the Holocaust Never Happened

5/5 ( ratings)

The "Extermination Camps" of "Aktion Reinhardt": An Analysis and Refutation of Factitious "Evidence," Deceptions and Flawed Argumentation of the "Holocaust Controversies" Bloggers (Holocaust Handbook)

5/5 ( ratings)

Rate this book!

Write a review?

loader