Read Anywhere and on Any Device!

Subscribe to Read | $0.00

Join today and start reading your favorite books for Free!

Read Anywhere and on Any Device!

  • Download on iOS
  • Download on Android
  • Download on iOS

Marcus Tullius Cicero Most Important Works: Epicurian Ethics, Existence of the Gods, Contempt for Death, Friendship, Fate, Stoic Ethics

Marcus Tullius Cicero Most Important Works: Epicurian Ethics, Existence of the Gods, Contempt for Death, Friendship, Fate, Stoic Ethics

Evelyn Shirley Shuckburgh
0/5 ( ratings)
CICERO MOST IMPORTANT WORKS - MOST IMPORTANT WORKS OF MARCUS TULLIUS CICEROEPICURIAN ETHICS, EXISTENCE OF THE GODS, CONTEMPT FOR DEATH, FRIENDSHIP, FATE, STOIC ETHICS Pleasure as the Chief GoodIX. I will start then in the way approved by the author of the system himself, by establishing what are the essence and qualities of the thing that is the object of our inquiry; not that I suppose you to be ignorant of it, but because this is the logical method of procedure. We are inquiring, then, what is the final and ultimate Good, which as all philosophers are agreed must be of such a nature as to be the End to which all other things are means, while it is not itself a means to anything else. This Epicurus finds in pleasure. Pleasure he holds to be the Chief Good, pain the Chief Evil. This he sets out to prove as follows: Every animal, as soon as it is born, seeks for pleasure, and delights in it as the Chief Good, while it recoils from pain as the Chief Evil, and so far as possible avoids it. This is behavior which has not yet been corrupted, and its nature remains pure and whole. Hence Epicurus refuses to admit any necessity for argument or discussion to prove that pleasure is desirable and pain to be avoided. These facts, be thinks, are perceived by the senses, as that fire is hot, snow white, honey sweet, none of which things need be proved by elaborate argument: it is enough merely to draw attention to them. Strip mankind of sensation, and nothing remains; it follows that Nature herself is the judge of that which is in accordance with or contrary to nature.What does Nature perceive or what does she judge of, beside pleasure and pain, to guide her actions of desire and of avoidance? Some Epicureans however would refine upon this doctrine: they say that it is not enough for the judgment of good and evil to rest with the senses. The facts that pleasure is in and for itself desirable and pain in and for itself to be avoided can also be grasped by the intellect and the reason. Accordingly they declare that the perception that the one is to be sought after and the other avoided is a notion naturally implanted in our minds. Others again, with whom I agree, observing that a great many philosophers do advance a vast array of reasons to prove why pleasure should not be counted as a good nor pain as an evil, consider that we had better not be too confident of our case; in their view it requires elaborate and reasoned argument, and abstruse theoretical discussion of the nature of pleasure and pain. Leon Trost B
Pages
170
Format
Paperback
Publisher
Independently Published
Release
November 20, 2018
ISBN
1731566875
ISBN 13
9781731566874

Marcus Tullius Cicero Most Important Works: Epicurian Ethics, Existence of the Gods, Contempt for Death, Friendship, Fate, Stoic Ethics

Evelyn Shirley Shuckburgh
0/5 ( ratings)
CICERO MOST IMPORTANT WORKS - MOST IMPORTANT WORKS OF MARCUS TULLIUS CICEROEPICURIAN ETHICS, EXISTENCE OF THE GODS, CONTEMPT FOR DEATH, FRIENDSHIP, FATE, STOIC ETHICS Pleasure as the Chief GoodIX. I will start then in the way approved by the author of the system himself, by establishing what are the essence and qualities of the thing that is the object of our inquiry; not that I suppose you to be ignorant of it, but because this is the logical method of procedure. We are inquiring, then, what is the final and ultimate Good, which as all philosophers are agreed must be of such a nature as to be the End to which all other things are means, while it is not itself a means to anything else. This Epicurus finds in pleasure. Pleasure he holds to be the Chief Good, pain the Chief Evil. This he sets out to prove as follows: Every animal, as soon as it is born, seeks for pleasure, and delights in it as the Chief Good, while it recoils from pain as the Chief Evil, and so far as possible avoids it. This is behavior which has not yet been corrupted, and its nature remains pure and whole. Hence Epicurus refuses to admit any necessity for argument or discussion to prove that pleasure is desirable and pain to be avoided. These facts, be thinks, are perceived by the senses, as that fire is hot, snow white, honey sweet, none of which things need be proved by elaborate argument: it is enough merely to draw attention to them. Strip mankind of sensation, and nothing remains; it follows that Nature herself is the judge of that which is in accordance with or contrary to nature.What does Nature perceive or what does she judge of, beside pleasure and pain, to guide her actions of desire and of avoidance? Some Epicureans however would refine upon this doctrine: they say that it is not enough for the judgment of good and evil to rest with the senses. The facts that pleasure is in and for itself desirable and pain in and for itself to be avoided can also be grasped by the intellect and the reason. Accordingly they declare that the perception that the one is to be sought after and the other avoided is a notion naturally implanted in our minds. Others again, with whom I agree, observing that a great many philosophers do advance a vast array of reasons to prove why pleasure should not be counted as a good nor pain as an evil, consider that we had better not be too confident of our case; in their view it requires elaborate and reasoned argument, and abstruse theoretical discussion of the nature of pleasure and pain. Leon Trost B
Pages
170
Format
Paperback
Publisher
Independently Published
Release
November 20, 2018
ISBN
1731566875
ISBN 13
9781731566874

More books from Evelyn Shirley Shuckburgh

Rate this book!

Write a review?

loader