Despite available technology and major disruptions that the internet brought about in many sectors of modern life, scholarly communication has seen change at glacial pace. Many useful, laudable tools and services are being developed to solve specific issues for particular domain groups; however, the question of how these efforts fit together remains largely unaddressed. If we have alternative models for all parts of the system, will that result in a coherent system? Will it be interoperable? Will it appeal to people as viable alternative? Will it be open and participatory for all? We propose is that of a scholarly commons: a set of principles and rules for the community of researchers and other stakeholders to ascribe to, the practices based on those principles, and the common pool of resources around which the principles and practices revolve. The tenets are that research and knowledge should be freely available to all who wish to use or reuse it , participation in the production and use of knowledge should be open to all who wish to participate, and there should be no systemic barriers nor disincentives to prevent either free use or open participation. We outline the backgrounds of the idea and various considerations that play a role in defining it. We share the principles of the scholarly commons and the degrees of freedom interpreting those principles, and consider the broader landscape of ideas and charters that the scholarly commons fits into and present a call for action on how to bring such a commons to fruition and what this would mean for different communities within science and scholarship.
Despite available technology and major disruptions that the internet brought about in many sectors of modern life, scholarly communication has seen change at glacial pace. Many useful, laudable tools and services are being developed to solve specific issues for particular domain groups; however, the question of how these efforts fit together remains largely unaddressed. If we have alternative models for all parts of the system, will that result in a coherent system? Will it be interoperable? Will it appeal to people as viable alternative? Will it be open and participatory for all? We propose is that of a scholarly commons: a set of principles and rules for the community of researchers and other stakeholders to ascribe to, the practices based on those principles, and the common pool of resources around which the principles and practices revolve. The tenets are that research and knowledge should be freely available to all who wish to use or reuse it , participation in the production and use of knowledge should be open to all who wish to participate, and there should be no systemic barriers nor disincentives to prevent either free use or open participation. We outline the backgrounds of the idea and various considerations that play a role in defining it. We share the principles of the scholarly commons and the degrees of freedom interpreting those principles, and consider the broader landscape of ideas and charters that the scholarly commons fits into and present a call for action on how to bring such a commons to fruition and what this would mean for different communities within science and scholarship.